Critic's Corner

Sunday, January 30, 2005

Million Dollar Baby

This movie had some superb acting in it and is, IMO, Eastwood's best piece of work. He and Morgan Freeman are old and washed up but they still have spirit, and I think that this is a very important part of the movie.

I think seeing Swank struggling for her dream of boxing, and becoming a fantastic contender, is a wonderful touch.

spoilers:

The foreshadowing was more prevalent in the attitude of her family than the actual story of her father that she told.

Euthanasia is a very controversial subject, and Eastwood went through a lot to bring us that lesson, but I (for once) believe it was worth it.

The kid in the gym who Morgan Freeman fights for is one of the best comic relief that I have seen in a drama in a long time. And when Freeman says "One Hundred and Ten", I actually applauded. So did half the theater.

Everything that Eastwood does in this movie is symbolic of the masochistic nature of his character. He keeps Freeman on the payroll- a constant reminder that he is the cause for his handicap. He attends church every day and playfully harasses the priest, but even though it is portrayed that he is trying to get over his past, it serves as little more than a reminder of that past. He writes his daughter every week- to no avail. The letters are always returned. In the final scene, when he pulls the plug, he is not only depriving himself of a daughter-figure and the chance to be the father he never was (Why? We never find out.) but he is once again blaming himself for taking on a project that he knew better than to start in the first place. I believe his character is the personification of the masochistic nature of man.

On Eastwood Himself:

Clint Eastwood has never been one of my favorites. His entire career has been pretentious and boring, although I have never seen Unforgiven, which I may be now willing to give a try. Frankly, most of the films he does bore the piss out of me. Mystic River was a pretty good movie, but it didn't rock my world or anything. Sean Penn was really good in it. Midnight in the Garden, with the love of my life Spacey- I nearly fell asleep. It was long and drawn out... I think the thing about Eastwood is that he takes a story and wants to tell every single aspect and nook and cranny and most of it is irrelevant- we don't need to know. Yet, he continues to leave out the most important pieces in his movies (that is, in the case of MDB, his past- what he did to lose the love of a daughter, but I suppose when you find out that Freeman is telling the story, perhaps we are left to guess that he doesn't even know the reason.)

Million Dollar Baby was IMO his best movie ever and if it loses Best Picture it will be a damned shame. But there were times when we were in the theater and they were doing a close-up of Eastwood on the screen- I turned and said "Is it just me, or does he look like a fish?"

Not a big Eastwood fan. But MDB was a very good movie.

Tuesday, January 25, 2005

OSCAR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Oscar night to me is like Super Bowl Sunday to most. It's the only day I refuse to work. It's a national holiday, IMO.

Here's the nods: http://www.oscar.com/nominees/nominees.html

Commentary on the Nods:

Alan Alda for BSA in The Aviator? He was IN that movie? I don't even remember him. Seriously- his part was small, and his acting was good, but are you HONESTLY trying to sell me on the thought that there were no better noms for BSActor? I just don't get it.

And Jamie Foxx for BOTH BA and BSA. Ray and Collateral. Hmm.... He won't win BSA, (Thomas Hayden Church will) but are they trying to tell us he's gonna win something?

And Kate Winslet for Eternal Sunshine! She won't win either.

Natalie Portman for Closer (She was fantastic in that movie) is up against Cate Blanchette for BSA.

Before Sunset for Best Adapted Screenplay. Awwww. (Sideways or Million Dollar Baby will get it, but it's a nice gesture. )

My predictions:
Best Actor: Jamie Foxx
Best Actress: Annette Benning vs Hilary Swank (WHOA! Flashback to 2000!!) I say Swank. I did say Bening, but I changed my mind.
Best Supporting Actor: Thomas Hayden Church (I can't believe Paul Giamatti didn't get nominated.)
Best Supporting Actress: Cate Blanchette (I know people are wanting Virginia Madsen, but Thomas Hayden Church is the shoo- in, we need a long shot winner this year. And I still don't think Madsen deserves it.)
Best Picture: Million Dollar Baby
Best Director: Martin Scorcese, The Aviator
Best Adapted Screenplay: Sideways
Best Original Screenplay: Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (Charlie Kauffman)

There you go. That's what I predict.

By the way- Paul Giamatti gets robbed so much, he's been named America's Most Dangerous Person to live near.

Sunday, January 23, 2005

Beyond the Sea, In Good Company & Sideways

Beyond the Sea

Kevin, Kevin, Kevin... Vaudeville, Broadway, The Old Vic... yes! Transitioning it to the big screen... meh. It pains me to give this movie a bad review, but I just couldn't get into it. Granted, I don't know much about Sandra Dee and Bobby Darin, and would probably appreciate it more if I did... but she's such a cheerleader. And I have to admit- I've never been a fan of Bosworth- the girl from Win A Date with Tad Hamilton. She is so young...

The singing was pretty good, but it was far from his best work.

I know that he did this movie for himself. I appreciate him sparking interest in a man he so admired. But I just wasn't... feeling it, I guess. Too bad.

In Good Company

Yeah- it was pretty good. Not what I expected, but in a good way. Johannsen was beautiful, as always, but she was playing an 18 year old *raises eyebrow*. Grace was good, as was Quaid.

The story itself jumped around all over, and you were never really sure how much time had elapsed- the only way to know was to look at Quaid's wife's belly to see how far along she was in her pregnancy. It was an interesting movie, but something about it was just... missing.

Sideways

Paul Giamatti and Thomas Hayden Church were fantastic in this movie. The dialogue was hilarious, the whole plot itself was great. Marcio said something interesting- I have to agree with him saying that Virginia Madsen was nothing fantastic. Perhaps the role needed to be meatier. The critics seem to love her, though.

Roger Ebert says that if "there's any justice in the world, (Virginia Madsen) will be nominated for an oscar for best supporting actress. Nominated? Yes. Awarded??? I don't agree. He says

"What happens between them all is the stuff of the movie, and must not be revealed here, except to observe that Giamatti and Madsen have a scene that involves some of the gentlest and most heartbreaking dialogue I've heard in a long time. They're talking about wine. He describes for her the qualities of the pinot noir grape that most attract him, and as he mentions its thin skin, its vulnerability, its dislike for being too hot or cold, too wet or dry, she realizes he is describing himself, and that is when she falls in love with him. Women can actually love us for ourselves, bless their hearts, even when we can't love ourselves. She waits until he is finished, and then responds with words so simple and true they will win her an Oscar nomination, if there is justice in the world." (Thanks for the link, sweetie)

However, that merely talks about the screenplay- it has nothing to do with her delivery of the monologue, even though it was good. Besides, I have a hard time being convinced that she fell in love with him. I think that's going a little overboard. I'd like to think that was when she realized that he was a lot more interesting than she had originally thought. To say that "she falls in love with him", in my honest opinion, is going a little too far. If anything, because I was not convinced that she fell in love with him at that point, she should not get the oscar.

It is a great movie, though. The merlot scene made me laugh my ass off; I couldn't agree more.